Rappahannock River
Basin Nonpoint Source Work Group

Future
Meetings:
August 9, 2006 - 10:00AM - RADCO
September 18, 2006 - 10:00AM - RADCO
|
According to the US EPA the Rappahannock
River and the Chesapeake Bay are degraded. Excess
amounts of nutrients and sediment flow into the River and
the Bay from the land and from the air (nonpoint source
pollution) and from wastewater treatment plants and from
industrial facilities (point source pollution). The
Rappahannock "Tributary Strategy" identifies nutrient and
sediment reduction goals necessary to achieve water quality
and aquatic habitat restoration objectives for the Bay by
2010, in accordance with the Chesapeake Bay Agreement of
2000. Attainment of these goals and objectives will
require a major effort on the part of all levels of
government, landowners and the public. A Summary
Assessment of the Problem that the Work Group is to address: |
NPS FEATURED ITEM:
Water Quality Management in
Virginia: Governmental Responsibilities and Relationships
Prepared
By Dr. William Cox

|
|
|
Problem Statement
According to the US EPA the Rappahannock River and
the Chesapeake Bay are degraded. Excess amounts of
nutrients and sediment flow into the River and the
Bay from the land and from the air (nonpoint source
pollution) and from wastewater treatment plants and
from industrial facilities (point source
pollution). The Rappahannock "Tributary Strategy"
identifies nutrient and sediment reduction goals
necessary to achieve water quality and aquatic
habitat restoration objectives for the Bay by 2010,
in accordance with the Chesapeake Bay Agreement of
2000. Attainment of these goals and objectives will
require a major effort on the part of all levels of
government, landowners and the public.
A Summary Assessment of the Problem that the Work
Group is to address:
The nutrient pollution issues in the Rappahannock
are driven mostly by nonpoint sources, such as
agriculture, land development, forestry, septic
systems and lawn management. Nonpoint sources are
regulated to a far less degree than point sources.
This means that more effort will have to be invested
on communication, coordination, cooperation, and
incentives to achieve success in addressing the
nonpoint source issues than for the point source
issues. The projections for success associated with
various strategies in the RTS are based on the
inputs and outputs of a model. The true measure of
success however will be the results found from
monitoring the quality of the waters of the
Rappahannock basin.
A “real world” focus to the implementation of
strategies is viewed as important and essential to
maximizing the opportunities for achieving the
greatest possible return on investments made in
addressing nonpoint source pollution. Opportunities
to share experiences and to forthrightly discuss
practical solutions will aid all stakeholders in
avoiding possible pitfalls, unintended consequences
and the repetition of mistakes.
The Mission of the Work Group
To provide a forum to discuss the practical
complexities, obstacles and difficulties associated
with the implementation of nonpoint source pollution
strategies of the RTS and to share experiences, both
good and bad, to enhance efficient and effective
investment of public and private resources. These
discussions will produce recommendations to the RRBC
and state, regional and local agencies responsible
for the implementation of the RTS.
Identified Issue Areas to be Addressed
1. Clarify the legal authority of various
stakeholders to act and identify where authority is
appropriate or inadequate to allow effective
implementation of the solutions identified in the
Rappahannock Tributary Strategy.
2. Encourage “buy-in” of state, regional and local
governments and agencies to the appropriate
regulation of land use activities and land
development in support of river-friendly water
quality objectives.
3. Is current or planned water quality monitoring
going to provide effective data to evaluate the
success of implementing nonpoint strategies? If not,
recommendations for improvements will be made.
4. Identify how to properly document successful and
unsuccessful practices and to communicate those
finding to others.
5. On-going assessment of the practicality of
implementation strategies or techniques and
providing feedback to DCR and other appropriate
overseers.
6. Recommend how to effectively track changes in
land use, and the rate of change, in the basin and
how to use that information efficiently to make
decisions that improve water quality.
7. Provide input and feedback to decision makers on
prioritizing the commitment of resources to maximize
results for dollars invested.
It is expected that, over time, issues will change
or be added or dropped.
Meetings and
Events
View Agenda
View Minutes
View Agenda
View Minutes
View Agenda
View
Minutes (Coming Soon)
View Agenda
View
Minutes
View Agenda
Work Group Recommendation -
Using the Web to
improve access to information, simplify citizen
interaction with land use agencies and enhance public
education for more cost-effective compliance with
existing water quality laws and regulations.
Improving Access to Information
Proposal
|
- November 21, 2006
View Agenda
View
Minutes (Coming Soon)
-
October 25, 2006
View Agenda
View Minutes
-
August 9, 2006
View Agenda
View
Minutes (Coming Soon)
-
July 5, 2006
View Agenda
View Minutes
-
June 7, 2006
View Agenda
View Minutes
-
May 11, 2006
View Agenda
View Minutes (Coming Soon)
-
April 12, 2006
View Agenda
View Minutes
-
December 2, 2005
View Agenda
Work Group Recommendation -
Using the Web to
improve access to information, simplify citizen
interaction with land use agencies and enhance public
education for more cost-effective compliance with
existing water quality laws and regulations.
Improving Access to Information
Proposal
- November
2, 2005
View Agenda
View Minutes
- September
14, 2005
View Agenda
View Minutes
- August 16, 2005
View Agenda
View Minutes
View Agenda
View Minutes
View Presentation
Presentation Attachments
View Agenda
View Minutes
|
Related Links
Low Impact Development
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area
Designation and Management Regulations
NRCS Soil Survey Database
"Living With Your Land" --
Informational Brochure
Tools for local
efficient land use decision
making:
Forest RIM GIS Web Mapping Tool
Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality Mapping Tool
|
|
|